Oct 30th, 2008
Politically Incorrect Truth About Human Nature – Barbie®
by Miles Benson

Why men want to date women who look like Barbie®. And why women want to look like her.
And why it’s okay to feel this way:
Barbie is young with small a waist, large breasts, long blond hair, and blue eyes. Why women want to look like her is because it is very much a realistic and sensible feeling to the desire of men to mate with women who look like her. There is evolutionary logic behind each of these features.
Hair. Men prefer young women in part because they tend to be healthier than older women. An accurate portrayal of health is physical attractiveness, hair is another. Younger women tend to have healthy lustrous, shiny hair, whereas the hair of older women tends to lose it’s luster.
Reproduction. Men have a universal preference for women with a low waist-to-hip ratio.
Boobs. Larger, and heavier, breasts sag more noticeably with age than do smaller breasts. Thus they make it easier for men to judge a woman’s age (and her reproductive value) by sight. This suggests why men find women with large breasts more attractive.
Eyes. Preference for blue eyes is both universal and undeniable—in males as well as females. Human pupils dilate when an individual is exposed to something that he/she likes. Pupil dilation is an honest indicator of interest and attraction. And the size of the pupil is easiest to determine in blue eyes. Blue-eyed people are considered an attractive potentiality because it is easiest to determine whether they are interested in us or not.
The evidence.
Hair. History shows that as far back as 15th century Italy, women were dying their hair blond. And a recent study shows that in Iran, where exposure to Western media and culture is limited, women are actually more concerned with their body image, and want to lose more weight, than their American counterparts. It is difficult to blame the desires of women in 15th century Italy and 21st century Iran on the socialization by media considering how few avenues there are and were to expose these cultures to this media. [Source]
Reproduction. These women tend to be healthier and more fertile than other women; they have an easier time conceiving a child and do so at earlier ages because they have larger amounts of essential reproductive hormones. Men unconsciously seek healthier and more fertile women when they seek women with small waists. [Source]
Boobs. Harvard anthropologist Frank Marlowe says that the sagging of the breasts make it easier for men to judge a woman’s age than with smaller breasts. Alternatively, men may prefer women with large breasts for the same reason they prefer women with small waists. Polish women show that women with large breasts and tight waists have the greatest fecundity, indicated by their levels of two reproductive hormones (estradiol and progesterone). [Source]
Eyes. One explanation is that the human pupil dilates when an individual is exposed to something that she likes. For instance, the pupils of women and infants (but not men) spontaneously dilate when they see babies. [Source]
The conundrum.
Face lifts, wigs, liposuction, boob jobs, hair dye, color contact lenses, and plastic surgery, any woman regardless of her age can have all of the key features that define the ideal female beauty. So why are we still attracted if we inherently know it’s all fake?
Especially if we take someone like Pamela Anderson for instance. She’s far past the age where her body could conceivably actually look close to how she looks now without surgery, yet, men look up to her as the definitive ideal model of our desires.
Why then?
The possible explanation here is something called, “The Savanna Principle,” which basically states, “the human brain has difficulty comprehending and dealing with entities and situations that did not exist in the ancestral environment.” Men’s brains may not be able to really comprehend silicone breasts or blonde hair dye, because these things did not exist in the ancestral environment 10,000 years ago. Men can cognitively and consciously understand that many blonde women with firm large breasts are not actually young, but they still find them attractive because their evolved psychological mechanisms are fooled by the modern inventions that did not exist in the ancestral environment.
Sociological introspection.
I think one of things I find so interesting about this, is how this attraction doesn’t affect all men and women. I think all the above evidence is true, but I also know many people do not feel this way. How is it that I am significantly affected by this and others are not? What does that say about them? What does that say about me?
When I desire Barbie-like attributes, am I just following the norm? Is my body refusing to see what other non-Barbie like women have to offer? Why is that? I’ve certainly dated a lot of women who are not Barbie-like. Can we control what we inherently desire?
I suppose I pose these questions, because I am fearful for what kind of decisions I will make in the future. Such as, if I find a girl that I would like to spend the rest of my life with who doesn’t have Barbie-like features, will I at some point become unattracted to that woman because she isn’t what I desire any longer? What happens then? It’s a scary thought to me.


October 30th, 2008 at 4:40 pm:
Wow!! From my own experience, compromise, especially without discrimination, is something that, for some reason, is so hard to come by in relationships. We want what we want how we want it without consideration to the partner involved. Unfortunatly, I’ve noticed this amongst the men in my relationships, more than the women, tho we are not immune to it. I’m probably missing so many points to the rest of the blog, but I feel that if people could learn to give in here and there and respect each others ideals, we could live so much richer in spirit and therefore all else. Give in without giving up who you are…
January 14th, 2009 at 6:31 pm:
OH MY GOSH! I see that you changed this, especially the sociological introspection part of this! I really like it so much better now! Is this what you meant when you texted me the other night? I frankly had no clue what you referring to when you said “my blog comments.” Now I’m excited!
So here is my not so optimistic response: I admit that I am probably going to sound like a heartless cynic but…I honestly believe that you are going to lose attraction to anyone you marry, or are with for a long time, even a Barbie look alike. I suppose I could go into this more, but I’ll just say that there are different kinds of love. That sparky attraction part of love goes away and is replaced with a different kind of attraction over time. I have been in two long term relationships. The first lasted about 3 years. The second has just now hit 3 years too. I struggle constantly with finding the balance between getting the stimulus, excitement and “attraction” I need along with the comfort, stability and security that I also need from a relationship. It’s something I never would have thought would be an issue if you had asked me at the beginning of my dating life. Maybe for most people it’s not an issue and I am odd. But I remember when i broke up with my ex my dad said to me when i was crying heartbroken on the ironically named loveseat in our living room, “Romantic love is Nature’s trick.” It is so easy to be attracted to someone and to fall for them and think that they are great, or even “the one.” But over time we lose this attraction and are sad and think “I will never love again.” But we are indeed “tricked” again. The cycle continues if it is Romantic Love that we prioritize in a relationship. But Romantic love is not the only type of love or attraction. In both of my 3 year relationships, the attraction and dynamic has changed. The things I was attracted to at first are not all of the things that I would say I am attracted to now. I have never gone beyond 3 years, but I imagine that as time passes and as the relationships changes even more, the attraction will change with it. I hate, again, to sound like a romantic-less cynic, but attraction, love, and a relationship/marriage, which are often grouped together, unfortunately are separate entities. Having one doesn’t give you the other. Just because you are attracted to someone doesn’t mean you can love them. Just because you love someone doesn’t mean you can make a relationship or marriage work. Just because you are no longer attracted, or even if you no longer love each other, it doesn’t mean the marriage can’t work. So maybe I have just been jaded too early by the broken relationships around me, but I believe that you WILL lose that initial attraction that probably draws you to many girls you meet. It may not be right away, but time is time and nature is tricky. What happens then? Hopefully there will be enough going for this girl, and for the lives you have built, or are still trying to build together, that this physical appeal can evolve into a different kind of appeal that will keep you interested. Not impossible. Good luck!
January 14th, 2009 at 6:49 pm:
I hate to keep going on this, but I guess this is where the compromise part that you talked about in your initial draft of this that ladywolf114 commented on as well. You think about and write about how you are worried YOU are going to lose attraction to your lover if she doesn’t meet you physical ideals. Have you ever given thought to your lover’s attraction to you? I bet you hope that she can look over your flaws, and accept you as you are, and accept you as you change, yet you seem unsure if you can reciprocate. I think this is the bigger potential problem. Getting involved with a flat chested brunette may be less detrimental than being unwilling to compromise with a person who doesn’t look like a Matel creation. I am not meaning to censure you, so don’t be offended. I understand totally what you are saying and why you express worry, and I also understand how important these “materialistic” girls are to you. But after reading Ladywolf’s comment the connection struck me and I am just calling it like I see it…food for thought…