<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Politically Incorrect Truth About Human Nature &#8211; Barbie®</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.powersourcestudios.net/blog/politicallyincorrecttruthsbarbie/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.powersourcestudios.net/blog/politicallyincorrecttruthsbarbie</link>
	<description>Now is not the Rhyme is the blog for which Miles Benson posts life anecdotes and site updates for his business Power Source Studios.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:52:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: I don't know what to use as a name</title>
		<link>http://www.powersourcestudios.net/blog/politicallyincorrecttruthsbarbie/comment-page-1#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>I don't know what to use as a name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.powersourcestudios.net/blog/?p=237#comment-864</guid>
		<description>I hate to keep going on this, but I guess this is where the compromise part that you talked about in your initial draft of this that ladywolf114 commented on as well.  You think about and write about how you are worried YOU are going to lose attraction to your lover if she doesn&#039;t meet you physical ideals.  Have you ever given thought to your lover&#039;s attraction to you?  I bet you hope that she can look over your flaws, and accept you as you are, and accept you as you change, yet you seem unsure if you can reciprocate.  I think this is the bigger potential problem.   Getting involved with a flat chested brunette may be less detrimental than being unwilling to compromise with a person who doesn&#039;t look like a Matel creation.  I am not meaning to censure you, so don&#039;t be offended.  I understand totally what you are saying and why you express worry, and I also understand how important these &quot;materialistic&quot; girls are to you.  But after reading Ladywolf&#039;s comment the connection struck me and I am just calling it like I see it...food for thought...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to keep going on this, but I guess this is where the compromise part that you talked about in your initial draft of this that ladywolf114 commented on as well.  You think about and write about how you are worried YOU are going to lose attraction to your lover if she doesn&#8217;t meet you physical ideals.  Have you ever given thought to your lover&#8217;s attraction to you?  I bet you hope that she can look over your flaws, and accept you as you are, and accept you as you change, yet you seem unsure if you can reciprocate.  I think this is the bigger potential problem.   Getting involved with a flat chested brunette may be less detrimental than being unwilling to compromise with a person who doesn&#8217;t look like a Matel creation.  I am not meaning to censure you, so don&#8217;t be offended.  I understand totally what you are saying and why you express worry, and I also understand how important these &#8220;materialistic&#8221; girls are to you.  But after reading Ladywolf&#8217;s comment the connection struck me and I am just calling it like I see it&#8230;food for thought&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I don't know what to use as a name</title>
		<link>http://www.powersourcestudios.net/blog/politicallyincorrecttruthsbarbie/comment-page-1#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>I don't know what to use as a name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.powersourcestudios.net/blog/?p=237#comment-863</guid>
		<description>OH MY GOSH! I see that you changed this, especially the sociological introspection part of this! I really like it so much better now!  Is this what you meant when you texted me the other night?  I frankly had no clue what you referring to when you said &quot;my blog comments.&quot;   Now I&#039;m excited!

So here is my not so optimistic response:  I admit that I am probably going to sound like a heartless cynic but...I honestly believe that you are going to lose attraction to anyone you marry, or are with for a long time, even a Barbie look alike.  I suppose I could go into this more, but I&#039;ll just say that there are different kinds of love.  That sparky attraction part of love goes away and is replaced with a different kind of attraction over time. I have been in two long term relationships.  The first lasted about 3 years. The second has just now hit 3 years too.  I struggle constantly with finding the balance between getting the stimulus, excitement and &quot;attraction&quot; I need along with the comfort, stability and security that I also need from a relationship.   It&#039;s something I never would have thought would be an issue if you had asked me at the beginning of my dating life. Maybe for most people it&#039;s not an issue and I am odd. But I remember when i broke up with my ex my dad said to me when i was crying heartbroken on the ironically named loveseat in our living room, &quot;Romantic love is Nature&#039;s trick.&quot;  It is so easy to be attracted to someone and to fall for them and think that they are great, or even &quot;the one.&quot; But over time we lose this attraction and are sad and think &quot;I will never love again.&quot; But we are indeed &quot;tricked&quot; again.  The cycle continues if it is Romantic Love that we prioritize in a relationship. But Romantic love is not the only type of love or attraction.  In both of my 3 year relationships, the attraction and dynamic has changed.  The things I was attracted to at first are not all of the things that I would say I am attracted to now.  I have never gone beyond 3 years, but I imagine that as time passes and as the relationships changes even more, the attraction will change with it.  I hate, again, to sound like a romantic-less cynic, but attraction, love, and a relationship/marriage, which are often grouped together, unfortunately are separate entities. Having one doesn&#039;t give you the other.  Just because you are attracted to someone doesn&#039;t mean you can love them.  Just because you love someone doesn&#039;t mean you can make a relationship or marriage work.  Just because you are no longer attracted, or even if you no longer love each other, it doesn&#039;t mean the marriage can&#039;t work.  So maybe I have just been jaded too early by the broken relationships around me, but I believe that you WILL lose that initial attraction that probably draws you to many girls you meet.  It may not be right away, but time is time and nature is tricky. What happens then?  Hopefully there will be enough going for this girl, and for the lives you have built, or are still trying to build together, that this physical appeal can evolve into a different kind of appeal that will keep you interested.  Not impossible.  Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OH MY GOSH! I see that you changed this, especially the sociological introspection part of this! I really like it so much better now!  Is this what you meant when you texted me the other night?  I frankly had no clue what you referring to when you said &#8220;my blog comments.&#8221;   Now I&#8217;m excited!</p>
<p>So here is my not so optimistic response:  I admit that I am probably going to sound like a heartless cynic but&#8230;I honestly believe that you are going to lose attraction to anyone you marry, or are with for a long time, even a Barbie look alike.  I suppose I could go into this more, but I&#8217;ll just say that there are different kinds of love.  That sparky attraction part of love goes away and is replaced with a different kind of attraction over time. I have been in two long term relationships.  The first lasted about 3 years. The second has just now hit 3 years too.  I struggle constantly with finding the balance between getting the stimulus, excitement and &#8220;attraction&#8221; I need along with the comfort, stability and security that I also need from a relationship.   It&#8217;s something I never would have thought would be an issue if you had asked me at the beginning of my dating life. Maybe for most people it&#8217;s not an issue and I am odd. But I remember when i broke up with my ex my dad said to me when i was crying heartbroken on the ironically named loveseat in our living room, &#8220;Romantic love is Nature&#8217;s trick.&#8221;  It is so easy to be attracted to someone and to fall for them and think that they are great, or even &#8220;the one.&#8221; But over time we lose this attraction and are sad and think &#8220;I will never love again.&#8221; But we are indeed &#8220;tricked&#8221; again.  The cycle continues if it is Romantic Love that we prioritize in a relationship. But Romantic love is not the only type of love or attraction.  In both of my 3 year relationships, the attraction and dynamic has changed.  The things I was attracted to at first are not all of the things that I would say I am attracted to now.  I have never gone beyond 3 years, but I imagine that as time passes and as the relationships changes even more, the attraction will change with it.  I hate, again, to sound like a romantic-less cynic, but attraction, love, and a relationship/marriage, which are often grouped together, unfortunately are separate entities. Having one doesn&#8217;t give you the other.  Just because you are attracted to someone doesn&#8217;t mean you can love them.  Just because you love someone doesn&#8217;t mean you can make a relationship or marriage work.  Just because you are no longer attracted, or even if you no longer love each other, it doesn&#8217;t mean the marriage can&#8217;t work.  So maybe I have just been jaded too early by the broken relationships around me, but I believe that you WILL lose that initial attraction that probably draws you to many girls you meet.  It may not be right away, but time is time and nature is tricky. What happens then?  Hopefully there will be enough going for this girl, and for the lives you have built, or are still trying to build together, that this physical appeal can evolve into a different kind of appeal that will keep you interested.  Not impossible.  Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ladywolf114</title>
		<link>http://www.powersourcestudios.net/blog/politicallyincorrecttruthsbarbie/comment-page-1#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator>ladywolf114</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.powersourcestudios.net/blog/?p=237#comment-787</guid>
		<description>Wow!!  From my own experience, compromise, especially without discrimination, is something that,  for some reason, is so hard to come by in relationships.  We want what we want how we want it without consideration to the partner involved.  Unfortunatly, I&#039;ve noticed this amongst the men in my relationships, more than the women, tho we are not immune to it.  I&#039;m probably missing so many points to the rest of the blog, but I feel that if people could learn to give in here and there and respect each others ideals, we could live so much richer in spirit and therefore all else.  Give in without giving up who you are...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!!  From my own experience, compromise, especially without discrimination, is something that,  for some reason, is so hard to come by in relationships.  We want what we want how we want it without consideration to the partner involved.  Unfortunatly, I&#8217;ve noticed this amongst the men in my relationships, more than the women, tho we are not immune to it.  I&#8217;m probably missing so many points to the rest of the blog, but I feel that if people could learn to give in here and there and respect each others ideals, we could live so much richer in spirit and therefore all else.  Give in without giving up who you are&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
